PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 08-2465 & 08-2466 _____________ SANDRA CORTEZ, Appellant in 08-2465 v. TRANS UNION, LLC SANDRA CORTEZ v. TRANS UNION, LLC, Appellant in 08-2466 On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Plaintiff, v. LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC., et al. Defendants. ) ) ______________________________________________________________________________ PLAINTIFF’S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC. AND SEISINT, INC.’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS ______________________________________________________________________________ FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. DONOVAN SEARLES,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) Plaintiff, vs. ) ) EXPERIAN INFO. SOLUTIONS, INC., et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ) PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HER RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC’S AND DEFENDANT ASSOCIATED CREDIT AND COLLECTION BUREAU, INC.’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiff, v. LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC., and REED ELSEVIER, INC. Defendants. ) PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC. AND REED ELSEVIER, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff hereby respectfully responds in
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANNA ELIZABETH PIRES ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. vs. ) ) CHOICEPOINT SERVICES INC. ) ) and ) ) CHOICEPOINT INC. ) ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT I. Preliminary Statement 1. This is an action for damages brought by an individual consumer against the
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT SANDRA CORTEZ ) ) Appellant/ ) Cross-Appellee ) Nos. 08-2465, 08-2466 vs. ) ) TRANS UNION, LLC ) ) Appellee/ ) Cross-Appellant ) ) APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE SANDRA CORTEZ’S RESPONSE AND REPLY BRIEF In this third step brief, Appellant/Cross-Appellee Sandra Cortez (“Cortez”) hereby responds to Appellee/Cross-Appellant’s Trans Union, LLC’s (“TU”)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ Karen A. Barel, on behalf of herself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) C. A. No. 06-2372 ) v. ) ) CLASS ACTION Bank of America, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) ORDER AND NOW, this _____ day of _____________, 2007, upon consideration of Defendant Bank of
FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. Land Title Building, 19th Floor 100 South Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19110 (215) 735-8600 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY FREDERIC , on behalf of himself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) C.A. No. vs. ) ) VISA U.S.A., INC., ) and ) INTER NATIONAL BANK , ) and )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GARY SERRANO, ) on behalf of himself and all others ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 07-4563 vs. )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GRACE LAWRENCE, ) on behalf of herself and all ) others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff ) C.A. No. 08-00679 vs. ) ) L.A. FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, ) CLASS ACTION ) Defendant. ) ) PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HER RESPONSE
Expert legal advice, private consultation, no obligation
If you do have case, there is no out-of-pocket cost to you.