CALL NOW: 1-877-735-8600

Consumer Rights Blog

Complaint Against H&P Capital for Harassing Debt Collection Practices

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA John Does Plaintiffs, v. H&P Capital, Inc. Defendant.         I.                   AMENDED COMPLAINT This is an action for damages brought by individual consumers, against Defendant, H&P Capital, Inc., for Defendant’s violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. (hereafter

Complaint Against Midland Credit for FDCPA Violations

In The United States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvania  Jane Doe Plaintiff, v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. Defendant.   COMPLAINT UNLAWFUL DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES I.  INTRODUCTION This is an action for damages brought by an individual consumer for Defendant’s violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. (hereafter the “FDCPA”) and

Complaint Against Big 3 Credit Reporting Agencies for Misreporting Collection Accounts with RJM Acquisition and HSBC

In The United States District Court For The Eastern District  of Pennsylvania  John Doe  Plaintiff, v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, Inc. and Trans Union, LLC Defendants. COMPLAINT   I.     Preliminary Statement 1.         This is an action for damages brought by an individual consumer against the Defendant for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (hereafter the “FCRA”),

Complaint Against Trans Union and Franklin Capital for Misreporting Bankruptcy

In The United States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Jane Doe  Plaintiff, v. Trans Union, LLC and Franklin Capital Corporation Defendants. Complaint  PRELIMINARY STATEMENT U   1.                  This is an action for damages brought by individual consumer, Jane Doe, against Trans Union LLC and Franklin Capital Corporation (collectively “Defendants”), for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act

Complaint Against Credit Agencies and Banks for Mixing Consumer’s Credit Files

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Jane Doe, Plaintiff v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC and DELL Financial Services, a/k/a CIT Bank/DFS and World Financial Network National Bank, d/b/a Express                                                                                   Complaint I.     Preliminary Statement 1.         This is an action for damages brought by an

Complaint Against Trans Union for Inaccurately Reporting Consumer as Deceased

In The United States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylania John Doe Plaintiff, v. Trans Union, LLC Defendant. COMPLAINT PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. This is an action for damages brought by an individual consumer, John Doe, against Trans Union, LLC for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (hereinafter the “FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681, et

Complaint against Major Credit Reporting Agencies for Misreporting Judgments and Collection Accounts

 In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania John Doe  Plaintiff, v. Trans Union, LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC  Defendants.                   COMPLAINT   I.                   Preliminary Statement   This is an action for damages brought by an individual consumer against the Defendants for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (hereafter

Firm’s $530,000 Verdict Against Trans Union Credit Reporting Agency

MEMORANDUM OPINION Savage, J. In its post-trial motion seeking a judgment of acquittal or a new trial, defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”) challenges the jury verdict finding that it had negligently and willfully violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681i (“FCRA”), when it failed to remove an erroneous collection account from

Cortez v. Trans Union, LLC Decision

Cortez v. Trans Union, LLC, 08-2465 Third Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms Punitive Damages Verdict Against Trans Union Credit Reporting Agency for Misreporting Woman as Being on Government’s OFAC List—Finding Its Conduct “Reprehensible” Court Finds Credit Reporting Agencies Must Treat Government OFAC Data Same as Regular Credit Information Philadelphia, PA, August 17, 2010 On Friday,

Archives

Protecting Consumer Rights Nationwide for Over 26 Years

Expert legal advice, private consultation, no obligation
If you do have case, there is no out-of-pocket cost to you.